Theory of the NEURONprocessor
Based on current brain research
"In 3 seconds to reality"
By Thomas Tankiewicz
Head of the NEURONprocessing Institute & Science Journalist
How to create an image of reality that has always been 3 seconds in the past.
With the NEURONprocessor software we take advantage of a fundamental mechanism of the brain, which we have taken from findings of brain research.
Let us first come to the practical part of the so-called "3 second bar".
One NEURONprocessor User (solver) is a concept and solution developer who has more access to his brain and associatively reads out information fields via morphic resonances: eg as matrix, collective unconscious, morphic field, etc. In combination, these two types of information call brain-matrix, as both seem closely interwoven.
One NEURONprocessor » At the core, the user (solver) learns how important it is to stick to the structure that the NEURONprocessor software dictates. The main purpose of the structure is to consider relevant only those information that spontaneously - ie within 3 seconds - rises in it. The information going beyond these 3 seconds can already be their own interpretations and personal contributions - and thus potentially of an analytical nature.
The three-second cycle illustrates why a solver needs to keep moving while working with the NEURONprocessor. It also becomes clear that humans are used to letting information flow into their consciousness within three seconds. This insight shows how the NEURONprocessor works in principle!
In NEURONprocessor theory, we postulate the said "non-material brain-matrix", in which any information about neuter and not neuter things are contained. These can be realized by focusing. The solver psychologically perceives information with his brain via a resonance effect and decodes it according to a specific procedure (protocol). He objectifies by writing, drawing and pronouncing the information thus obtained. It can be assumed that intuition - in the sense of forebodings and intuition - is based on the same effect. Only the intuition occurs more situationally or spontaneously and always goes hand in hand with the amount of meaning that is given to it. Women tend to do this more than men - because both appear to be equally intuitive in current research.